Profilo

Registrato: 2 anni, 3 mesi fa

Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in disk file site Let's consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.    Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.    Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.    The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.    However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.    There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.      Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.    It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.    It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.      Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.  It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.  If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.    OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.    By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.    The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.      It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.    Rental vs. Construction.      Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files online at a set monthly cost. This means that using web hard is becoming common.        But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.        The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.      In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.        NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.        Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.      Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one according to the reality and needs. p2p 추천

Sito web: https://www.asiadisk.com

---

Forum

Topic aperti: 0

Risposte create: 0

Ruolo forum: Partecipante