Profilo

Registrato: 2 anni, 4 mesi fa

file down site what's webhard?  When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).    Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).    Webhard     It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.    p2p 순위 Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.    When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only must be in a folder.    You must share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.    According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***    It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)    It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.    You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.    The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)    Google Drive    It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.    It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.    It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.    Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.    There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.    Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.    If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)      Dropbox    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.    There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.        The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.    The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.    The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.    Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...    There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.    Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.    There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.     Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.    File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.    Slow. Not paid people.     Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.    The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***    Skydrive    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.    The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.

Sito web: https://www.asiadisk.com

---

Forum

Topic aperti: 0

Risposte create: 0

Ruolo forum: Partecipante