Profilo

Registrato: 2 anni, 3 mesi fa

down site donwload site  When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.    When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).    Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.    File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).    Webhard     It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.    Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.    When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.    You need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.    According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***    It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)    It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.    You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.    The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)    Google Drive    It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.    It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.    If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.    There are probably the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.    Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. 최신 웹하드 There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.    If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)      Dropbox    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.        The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.    The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.    The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.    The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.    Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...    You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.    Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.    There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.     In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.    File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.    Slow. Not paid people.     Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.    The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.    If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).    It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***    Skydrive    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.

Sito web: https://mongfile.com

---

Forum

Topic aperti: 0

Risposte create: 0

Ruolo forum: Partecipante